UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KINERJA ANGGOTA PADA BAGIAN PEMELIHARAAN ALAT UTAMA SISTEM SENJATA MILITER  DI LANUD HALIM PERDANAKUSUMA

Diky Dwi Udariyanto; Jazuli Akhmad

Authors

Diky Dwi Udariyanto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha
Jazuli Akhmad Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha

Keywords:

Performance, Defense Equipment

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the performance, find out why the performance of members is less than optimal, formulate efforts to improve the performance of members in the maintenance section of the military defense equipment. The research approach used by the researcher is a qualitative approach. The data source that will be selected is focusing on the bearers of the human resource function, especially those in charge of evaluating the performance of personnel. Data collection techniques using observation methods, in-depth interviews, and document studies. The data analysis technique using interactive analysis according to Milles and Hubermen consists of three paths, namely: data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing/verification. The results showed that the performance of the Military Alutsista Maintenance Section was good but still less than the maximum seen from the achievements and elements of the success of the Members in the Military Alutsista Maintenance section in resolving the cases of the Members in the Military Alutsista Maintenance section and investigations. The causes of the quality of Members in the Maintenance of Military Alutsista are not optimal are the elements of success of Members in the Maintenance of Military Alutsista in resolving cases of Members in the Maintenance of Military Alutsista and investigations, Achievements that are still not optimal, Assessment of the implementation of the performance management sistem which is judged from the rewards obtained members in the maintenance section of the Military Alutsista are still not good and optimal. Efforts to improve the quality of Members in the Military Alutsista Maintenance section are complying with disciplinary regulations, maximizing the environmental atmosphere, maximizing existing infrastructure facilities in carrying out activities, a good assessment is also found in the application of a feedback performance management sistem from leadership coaching, making various efforts to fostering Members in the Maintenance of Military Alutsista.

References

Anwar, Dessy, 2001, Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta, Karya Abditama.

Bachtiar, Harsja W, 1994, IlmuKepolisian: Suatu Cabang Ilmu Pengetahuan yang Baru, Jakarta, PTIK-Gramedia.

Azhari, Andi Titin, 2011, Interpretasi Terhadap Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Polri Pada Polres Metro Jakarta Barat, Program Pascasarjana, Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia.

Bailey, William G, 2005, Ensiklopedia Ilmu Kepolisian, Jakarta:YPKIK.

Bayley David H, 1998, Police for The Future/Polisi Masa Depan. Penyadur Jend (purn) Koenarto dan Ny Khobibah M Arif Dimyati, Jakarta, CV Cipta Manunggal.

Bungin, Burhan, 2007, Penilaian kualitatif, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Creswell, J. W., 2002, Research Design Qualitative & Quantitative. (Edisi revesi). (Angkatan III & IV KIK UI dan N. Khabibah, Penerjemah). Jakarta: KIK press,

Daulay, D. Dkk. 2017. Manajemen. Medan : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penulisan

Dharma, Surya, 2010, Manajemen Kinerja: Falsafah, Teori dan Penerapannya, Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Djamin, Awaloedin, 1995, Administrasi Kepolisian RI, Bandung, Sanyata Sumanasa Wira.

Djamin, Awaloedin, 1995, Manajemen Sumber daya manusia I: Kontribusi Teoritis Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Organisasi, Bandung, Sanyata Sumanasa Wira.

Hardiyansyah, 2012, Sistem Administrasi dan Manajemen Sumber daya manusia Sektor Publik, Yogyakarta, Gava Media.

Hasibuan, J. S., & Silvya, B. 2019. Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Ilmu (pp.134–147). Ilmiah Aqli

Maleong, Lexy.J. 2002. Metodologi Penilaian kualitatif, Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu, 2005, Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Manulang, M, dan Marihot AMH Manulang, 2008, Manajemen Personalia, Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada University Press.

Muhammad, Farouk, dan Djaali, 2005, Metodologi penelitian sosial, Restu Agung, Jakarta.

Nawawi, Hadari, 2006, Evaluasi dan Manajemen Kinerja di Lingkungan Instansi dan Industri, Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada University Press.

Philp, Tom, 1990, Appraising Performance For Results, Berkshire, England, McGraw-Hill.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya. Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Rroberg, Roy R dan Jack Kuykendall, 2012, Police Management, Jakarta, PTIK Press.

Siagian, Sondang, 2007, Manajemen Sumber daya manusia, Jakarta, BumiAksara.

Soetjipto, Budi W dan Niken Ardiyanti, 2006, Menggapai SDM Optimal, Jakarta, Lembaga Menagement Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Stewart, Valerie and Andrew, 1980, Practical Performance Appraisal, Hampshire, England, Gower Publishing.

Sugiyono, 2012, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung, Alfabeta.

Sunarno, Edy, 2010, Berkualitas, Profesional, Proporsional Membangun SDM Polri Masa Depan, Jakarta, Grafika Indah.

Sutanto, 2005, Polrimenuju era baru pacu kinerja tingkatkan citra pelindung, pengayom, pelayan masyarakat, Jakarta, Unpublishing.

Wahjono, Sentot Imam, 2009, PerilakuOrganisasi, Yogyakarta, Graha Ilmu.

Wahyuni, Kus Sri, 2012, Efektifitas Pemberian remunerasi Guna Meningkatkan Kinerja: Sebuah Percontohan di Polres Magelang Kota, Program Pascasarjana, Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia.

Wibowo, 2007, Manajemen Kinerja, Jakarta, Rajawali Press.